Skip to main content
note
This page was translated from the German original, partly by machine. Some passages may read awkwardly or contain inaccuracies. When in doubt, please read the original.

Exercise: Identifying Premises and Conclusions

Identify the premises and conclusion in the following arguments. Also determine whether the argument is valid and whether it contains hidden assumptions.

Exercises:​

1. "Since all birds have feathers and penguins are birds, penguins must have feathers."​

2. "The streets are wet, so it has rained."​

3. "If one has a good education, one gets a well-paid job. Maria has a well-paid job, so she must have a good education."​

4. "Either we raise taxes or we cut social benefits. We cannot cut social benefits. Therefore, we must raise taxes."​

5. "All politicians are corrupt. Hans is a politician. Consequently, Hans is corrupt."​

Solutions:​

  1. Premises: "All birds have feathers" and "Penguins are birds" Conclusion: "Penguins have feathers" Validity: Valid (Modus Ponens) Hidden assumptions: None essential
  1. Premise: "The streets are wet" Conclusion: "It has rained" Validity: Invalid (there are other possible causes for wet streets) Hidden assumptions: "Rain is the only possible cause for wet streets"
  1. Premises: "If one has a good education, one gets a well-paid job" and "Maria has a well-paid job" Conclusion: "Maria has a good education" Validity: Invalid (affirming the consequent fallacy) Hidden assumptions: "A good education is the only way to get a well-paid job"
  1. Premises: "Either we raise taxes or we cut social benefits" and "We cannot cut social benefits" Conclusion: "We must raise taxes" Validity: Valid (Disjunctive Syllogism) Hidden assumptions: "There are only these two options"
  1. Premises: "All politicians are corrupt" and "Hans is a politician" Conclusion: "Hans is corrupt" Validity: Valid (categorical syllogism) Hidden assumptions: The truth of the first premise is questionable